Thoughts of a Protest

PLP MP for Constituency 15, Walter Roban, JP, MP contributed the following piece:

Today (Tuesday June 16, 2009) I attended an event that was less like a mature political demonstration but more like a mob on their way to attend a WWF showdown. Like rabid dogs anxious for their pound of flesh, they were roaring loudly organized like a pack unsatisfied unless blood would be drawn.

Additionally, we once again have been graced with the announcement of another right wing pseudo fascist organization emerging from the depths of our island. As per usual instead of confining themselves to old style basements or a dark smoky meetings room, they now use the internet as their shadowy realm to hide and spew their venom and hate. Bermudians Against Terrorists B.A.T. (Bermuda affiliate of the British National Party) are clearly savouring what they see as a victory in terms of a strong show in numbers versus a poor showing for supporters of the government at the Cabinet Office. The fact that they appeared to represent a particular segment of the population colour-wise will be seen as a weakness.

Many people will believe this was a unique sight for some to see in Bermuda. It was not the usual hardhead union fellas out protesting labour dissatisfaction; it was what appeared to be the ‘country club crowd’ and their less affluent associates showing their displeasure for the so-called ‘Brown Administration’ (no pun intended). They also came to hear their Pied Piper and clarion-caller Janice Battersbee from the podium, reading off a litany of charges against the honorable Premier at what was appearing less like a rally and more like an outdoor trial. Was there to be due process? Will evidence of wrong doing be presented? Did they have witnesses? No, just the call from the mob with placards saying, Go Back to California! Dictator Brown Must Go Down!

As I was listening and watching all of this I asked myself, ‘Is this how they did it during the Witch Trials or perhaps this is how they finally put the flames to Sally Bassett?’ Ironically her statue was not far away from my sight. PLP Supporter, Laverne Furbert said on the BBC News Tuesday night (as she tried to be interviewed over a disruptive, ranting, rude white female protester), that it reminded her of the mobs that lynched Black men in the Southern US generations go. This group did come to do a lynching; they came to politically lynch Premier Ewart Brown.

The people on the lawn today appear to be a part of a group who have always felt we, the PLP, were not worthy of running the government. Their foul mood, foul language and name calling was so clear for everyone to see. The abuse was so widespread while the honourable Premier spoke the mob continuously cried out” Brown must go, “Brown must go! Brown must go, Brown must go!” They came to the Cabinet Office for name-calling and ridiculing doing all of this under the fraudulent veil of democracy, or at least what they believe it to be. This is what they came for. I also know that they were emailing people during the event pleading for them to come because the faces of their supporters were not ‘black’ enough. Today was really not that unique, more like a re-run of a scene over and over again in a bad old movie, similar to those terrible scenes in D. W. Griffiths ‘Birth of a Nation’.

We must remember, the members of the PLP and other progressive people are used to being called names, it comes with the territory. People like that mob called Dr. E. F. Gordon lots of names to the point that he responded to their indignity by changing his name to 'Mazumbo' to get their attention.

I remember they called Premier Jennifer Smith a ‘dictator’ when she introduced the amendments to the Constitution in early 2000 to bring about the aspiration of democracy and one person one vote, one vote of equal value with single seat constituencies. They even accused the PLP Government of a Bermuda-form of ‘ethnic cleansing’. I remember back then, the United Bermuda Party (UBP) complained about ‘the process’ as well.

They called the PLP names again and again when we sought to introduce a long term residents policy giving persons (who were neither Bermudian nor voters) some normalization their status in Bermuda. I remember they called Premier Alex Scott names when he put forward the proposal of a Commission to review Independence.

They called Dr. Brown and the PLP names when we removed the indignity of an Indigent Clinic to allow all Bermudians the opportunity to quality healthcare from a physician of their choice. Now, they are here again, calling Premier Brown names for initiating a humanitarian effort to give a home to innocent to 4 innocent men. At the same time the international community applaudes Bermuda’s courage. Is their protest really about ‘the process’ or is it about something else?

The pattern is clear here but the PLP and our leaders are used to it. I know that no ugly mob, no Pied Piper, or a group of the ‘Usual Suspects’ will stop the determination of the PLP. All of us who are members and supporters will stand by our government proving to the world Bermudians are a people of friendship, compassion and humanity. We believe in helping those in need and are prepared to stand for what is right not matter the cost. We stand, by our Leader and Premier Ewart Brown for his continued commitment and courage, in defence of what is right for Bermuda and her people.

PLP ALL THE WAY, ALL THE WAY PLP.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Were you even at the same protest?

While this race-baiting garbage barely merits a response, it is worth noting that this man's view of the protest is skewed by his own hatred. This was a peaceful protest - there was nothing rabid about it! Also, if you'd been there, you'd have heard a young (black, not that it should matter) Bermudian called Wayne Ball note that he had started the Bermudians Against Terrorism facebook group but CHANGED the name to Bermudians Against Government Corruption, because he has nothing against the Uighurs (incidentally, not terrorists, and entirely welcome here by everyone at the rally!) but because he has a problem with ignoring due process.
Also, where was this country club crowd? There were 6 organisers of this rally - 3 black, 3 white, and from all walks of life. There were people from all walks of life there - check out the photos - they're on Bermynet, accessible to all.
No one with a shred of intelligence is accepting this further attempt (one of thousands at this point) to divide and rule with your racist rhetoric. Democracy allows for protest. Ours was peaceful.
Also, I love that Sally Bassett had to be brought into this yet again. Obviously the Premier chose to stand in front of her statue to make a point - the same pathetic, empty point you bring up with the anachronistic, irrelevant term 'lynching'.
This protest had zero to do with race and everything to do with respect for the constitution and a disgust at what many see as dictatorial one-man rule.

r there any racist whites in bda

according to the blogs the only racist people in bda seem to be black and plp - maybe if u admitted that some of ur friends are indeed rednecks it would be believable when u accuse only people w/ blk skin of being racists
but in 2009 nobodies buying the crazy concept that bda only has blk racist and the whites are the good guys

This is untrue, sir.

No one has ever said that the only racist people in Bermuda are black and PLP. That is incorrect.

Many of us have, in fact, stated quite openly that yes, there are white racists in Bermuda. You choose to ignore this.

No matter how many times you repeat the same tired lies, they won't become true.

No matter how many times you try to put words in people's mouths, it won't change the reality.

The Same Protest

You're correcting in pointing out that there was no violence, but, that doesn't mean it was peaceful. There was certainly hate and disrespect. They were screaming hateful slogans and carrying hateful signs. As for Bermudians Against Terrorism, it's telling to note that the majority of the people on the facebook group joined BEFORE the group callously changed the name out of political expediency.

I don't want to talk about race, but, since you brought it up, let's look at some cold, hard statistical facts. I think it's important to note that 85% of the crowd was white. Yes, there were a few black faces in the crowd, but, remember, the UBP also tends to draw around ~15% of the black vote. Coincidence that about 15% of the attendees were black? I think not. Now, you can go and cherry pick a few so-called "PLP" people that were part of the crowd. There were certainly a few exceptions, but, the rule still stands: this was a protest of hateful UBP voters who will do anything to get rid of the Premier.

As for a 'lynch mob,' Ms. Furbert was right: it was a political lynching. They wanted The Premier's political scalp. They shouted hateful slogan to this end. You can't deny that - "Brown must go," a call for his political scalp, was shouted by virtually every protester there.

no, sir.

There was no hate. That is untrue.

This, too, is untrue...

And a gross, racist misrepresentation of the events of Tuesday afternoon.

A True Interpretation

UE, instead of continuing to spew hateful rhetoric, why don't you explain yourself?

I have explained myself.

And nothing I have said is either hateful or rhetoric.
Please don't twist my words.

What is hateful is negatively labelling a group based solely on their skin colour.
What is hateful is an outright refusal to address their issues and points of view, based on their skin colour.

Facts Are Stubborn Things

UE, the facts are the facts and they are stubborn things. Yes, the group was 85% white. That's a fact. Yes, the group was almost exclusively (with a few exceptions) composed of people who voted UBP in the last election. Yes, the group was a hateful political lynch mob calling for a political scalp. Sorry, I know the truth hurts, but, I hope for your own intellectual honesty, you'll acknowledge it.

No, sir.

That is incorrect and not, in fact, a fact.

It was NOT hateful, it was NOT a lynch mob. That is NOT the truth and what hurts is that a countryman would be so disgustingly racist against his fellow Bermudians. THAT hurts.

You, sir, after your obfuscations, lies and evasions, are in no position to lecture me on intellectual honesty.
You have shown none.

Your labelling this crowd the way you have is a disgusting, hateful lie. THAT is the truth. THAT is a fact.

Corrections

How was it not a political lynch mob? It was a large group of angry, hateful people that were calling for the Premier's political scalp. Did you not hear the chants? I'll forgive you if you are deaf.

because it wasn't.

It wasn't a lynch mob. A lynch mob is a group of people intent on hanging someone from the neck until dead.

You've made up this racist appelation. You've made up the definition of "political lynch mob".
It's not a saying anywhere but in your head.

It was not a lynch mob. It was not a group of hateful people. They were not calling for his Political scalp.
They were saying that they had had enough of the way he does things and this was the final straw.

No matter how much you try to spin it, the things you are saying are not only untrue, they are vile and racist.

assertions from committed opponent...

does not the truth make.

How were they NOT calling for his political scalp? Did you hear the chants? Or, are you deaf?

um...

Because there's no such thing as a "political scalp". You made that up because it sounded good and made the crowd seem more like a mob than the organized peaceful, if angry and frustrated, group that they were.

um...

I trust you'll be writing to the political editor of The Observer and telling her that she's making absolutely no sense because that phrase doesn't exist.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/apr/12/guido-fawkes-damian-mcbri...

"Mission accomplished", ran the brief message posted around 5pm yesterday on Guido Fawkes's blog, next to a picture of the recently departed Damian McBride. For once, it was not hyperbole. Yesterday marked the British blogosphere's first big political scalp, and the day political new media in the UK came of age.

oh, for...

Never mind. You're far too "clever" for me.

Of course you weren't using inciteful words. Nooo.. never.

You win. They were after his political scalp.

thanks.

I appreciate your honesty.

Mr. Roban,Do you support

Mr. Roban,

Do you support the circumventing of Bermuda's constitution by two individuals? Do you agree that Dr. Brown and Minister Burch had the right to make such a decision without consulting you and the rest of the elected representatives which WE the people put into power? Do you agree that Dr. Brown was justified to tell false truths to the House of Assembly and to the people of BDA as a whole?

People have asked these questions over and over again and all we get is the same and predictable race baiting argument that this administration has always resorted to when tryign to defend some of its actions.

Why is it when a white person demonstrates against a black political leader it automatically becomes a racial thing and not an issue based demonstration? Is that how you want BDA to be? Should us white folks just shut up and take it because of the color of our skin? Sounds like you want to revert back to the old days in which the ignorant whites of the day attempted to silence and demonize your people at every opportunity.

Secondly, what do you expect a protest to be like when people are angry? One where people whisper their anger? The whole world demonstrated against Bush and he did not sit there and cry to the media about the names he was called. Because freedom of speech is a beautiful thing. .

And what names, other then dictator, was Dr. Brown being called at the protest? I am quite sure you didn't have very many nice things to say during you and Dr. Brown's day of protesting against the establishment which persecuted your people for so long.

This administration claims to be the leader in reconciling BDA's population, but with crap like that above and numerous quotes and articles demonizing whites ona weekly basis by this adminitration it appears just to be another "we had to deceive you" tactic from the start. The Big Conversation is a facade.

And also do you claim Ms. Battersbee's list of complaints and allegations of Dr. Brown to be false? Those were all well documented events and not some mythical occurences which have been made up by your mythical combined opposition.

Like it or not that is democracy in action and there was no veil, but just angry citizens. But because they are white they don't count in this Government's view. But continue to divide the population with nasty racial rhetoric like the above, which seems that is all the Dr. Brown administration has left in its arsenal. It can only last so long and we the younger population who have grown up in a BDA which has not been segregated will not tolerate such hate and divisiveness.

I think it is time for the young generation of tis island to start a new party. One which can't e labelled by anyone but ourselves.

I also find it quite

I also find it quite interesting when there was internal turmoil a few weeks back concerning Dr. Brown's leadership that the PLP made it quite clear that the challenge was being executed in contradiction to the PLP's constitution and therefore was labelled invalid due to it being "unconstitutional."

Are you saying Mr. Roban that the PLP's constitution is more important to be upheld and adhered to then BDA's constitution which is aimed at protecting and ensuring the rigths and freedoms of ALL Bermudians and not just the indviduals who vote and support your party?

Interesting stuff....

Some Answers

I imagine Walter's busy today, so, I'll chime in with some answers:

1) The Constitution was not subverted.

2) The democratically elected Government of Bermuda has the right and obligation to make immigration decisions.

3) Dr. Brown told the truth that the detainees were not a danger to the Bermudian people. I think it is laudable that he didn't stoke fear against these innocent men.

4) It's not. All we're pointing out is that this is the people that are protesting are the same old group of people who have opposed the Premier from the beginning. This is just their latest excuse for hate.

5) In Bermuda, everyone has a right to full and free expression.

6) People of all races have a right to full and free expression.

7) So, you acknowledge the protest was an angry and hateful political lynch mob?

8) I think there's a difference between Dr. King's We Can Overcome songs and a hateful political lynch mob.

9) I don't think it would be appropriate to repeat some of the language I heard here. Yes, I think there is a big difference between demonstrating for equality of treatment and opportunity and a political lynch mob.

10) Yes, I believe that the majority of Mrs. Battersbee's allegations were false. And, given that she read most of the speech, I'd like to know who wrote it.

You have a right in a democracy to organise hateful political lynch mobs. I'm glad to see that you're exercising your rights.

I didn't ask you and to tell

I didn't ask you and to tell you the truth I don't care about your answers. So when mr. Roban is ready or willing to answer these questions (which are no doubt plantation questions) he will. Until then rocksolid mind your business and answer questions that are put forth to you and you only.

Hmmm..

Interesting that I vigorously protect YOUR right to free expression and speech, but, you seek to deny me mine.

Unless...

Unless it's against something or someone you support, then it's just a "hateful white lynch mob", right?

Whoa

Where did I say that this group didn't have a right to protest? And, I never called it a white lynch mob, I called it a political lynch mob.

You'd get some credence if

Just on number 3:
You say: 3) Dr. Brown told the truth that the detainees were not a danger to the Bermudian people. I think it is laudable that he didn't stoke fear against these innocent men

You therefore believe Dr. Brown a better judge of security to Bermuda than the head of the Bermuda Police force, who said: "A preliminary threat assessment of the men conducted the following day described them as high risk".

So spin away. Personally, I'm going to take the word of the guy trained in these matters. But I know Dr. Brown is omnipotent, so I guess he trumps again. Or is the head of police part of the combined opposition?

Security

I think that the American security experts who held these men for nearly a decade, international security experts and academics who have been studying the Uighurs for decades are in a better position to judge whether or not these men are a threat than the head of the Bermuda police. Are you really going to argue otherwise?

irrelevant.

Dr. Brown said that they were vetted by the police and found to be no security risk.
They weren't and there's no possible way that he could have thought they had been, as he hadn't told them they were coming.

He lied.

Yes.

I will argue. The reason our police force were asked to vet these men is because Bermuda gets a say in its security. Do you want to rely completely on external sources for our security information?

Why don't you ask China's opinion? Because it's biased in this case. Just like the US.

It's a Bermuda policing issue which is why Dr. Brown asked the Bermuda head of police to vet them.

AGREE

I totally agree with this as the fact is that we don't have all the facts. We are relying on the U.S. to tell us about men that they don't want to keep in their own country. What is the issue with gathering ALL the information or gaining a second opinion BEFORE making a decision of this magnitude. What is wrong with talking about the possible LONG TERM implications of such a decision with your cabinet? It does not seem as though much though went into this decision and THIS is the issue. Should we throw caution to the wind in favor of these men while possibly compromising our own country's safety, security, economy etc.?
That is just ludicrous.

International Experts

It's not just the American justice officials, it's also the American courts and international experts that have deemed the Uighurs safe. That said, I don't see anywhere in the immigration law that a vetting by the Police Commissioner is a prerequisite for anything. As far as I can see, the individuals are being investigated, and, therefore, the Constitution is being followed.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.